What Did US Lawmakers Ask Miners Core Scientific, Riot, Marathon & Stronghold?

Share This Post


The 4 greatest US-based mining operations – Core Scientific, Marathon Digital Holdings, Riot Blockchain, and Stronghold Digital Mining – obtained a letter from the Home Committee On Power and Commerce. The Committee needs to find out about their power utilization and “how each company is mitigating those impacts and what steps are being taken to ensure their operations do not strain the energy grid or undermine our nation’s climate goals.”

Is that this a teachable second or an indication of issues to come back? Are Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold ready for the duty? May curiosity from the US Authorities truly be a constructive signal for the sector? Or are they tightening up measures to assault the bitcoin mining business? Why Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold? Why now? Does it should do with BlackRock giving bitcoin mining the inexperienced gentle? Or does it should do with the extreme sanctions towards Twister Money?

 In a press launch, the Home Committee On Power and Commerce described the Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold circumstances as:

“Blockchain technology holds immense promise that may make our personal information more secure and economy more efficient. However, the energy consumption and hardware required to support PoW-based cryptocurrencies may, in some instances, produce severe externalities in the form of harmful emissions and excess electronic waste.”

The place does the Home will get this data from? The fully debunked Digiconomist, maybe? Did they learn this letter 14 Members of Congress despatched to the EPA? Do they find out about how bitcoin can put methane to good use and curb fuel flaring within the course of?

Background To The Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold circumstances

Think about BlackRock’s latest reversal on their bitcoin coverage:

“BlackRock has been a leader in the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) movement. The firm and others have injected billions of capital into companies that meet their criteria. Bitcoin was thought to be outside of this movement due to its alleged high energy consumption.
Today’s announcement, coming from the largest investment firm in the world, sends a completely different signal to the financial world. According to analytics account MacroScope, BlackRock is waving the “green “BTC is ok” flag to the complete ESG-focused funding sector.”

Nevertheless, additionally contemplate the severity of the sanctions towards Twister Money:

“This sanction came directly from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which is responsible for sanctioning countries and foreign entities that the US government has deemed enemies of the state or major criminals. So just as transacting with a country or organization sanctioned by OFAC is illegal, so is transacting with Tornado Cash or any funds associated with it.”

The query right here is: Does the Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold case pertains to the primary story or to the second? Is the US about to declare the extremely worthwhile exercise of bitcoin mining as ESG-friendly? Or are they tightening the screws?

BTC value chart for 08/21/2022 on Bitfinex | Supply: BTC/USD on TradingView.com

What Does The US Authorities Need To Know?

The opposite quote within the press launch doesn’t sound good for bitcoin mining within the US. The  Home Committee On Power and Commerce informed Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold:

“Given the existential threat posed by the climate crisis, we are deeply concerned about efforts like this that increase demand for fossil fuels, with the potential to put new strain on our energy grid. While blockchain technology is emerging as a potentially important tool in fighting climate change, increasing demand on the grid and burning more fossil fuels to power PoW cryptomining facilities only serves to undermine the potential climate benefits of blockchain technology and hold us back from achieving our climate pollution reduction goals.”

Think about, although, the findings of the Bitcoin Mining Council. “According to the BMC survey, participants are using electricity with 66.8% of the sustainable power mix. This represents an increase over Q1, 2022, data and records an estimate of 59.5% sustainable electricity mix across the entire Bitcoin network.” If the federal government makes a radical investigation and concludes this to be true, a complete business might get the stamp of approval it’s been ready for. 

Nevertheless, the alternative can be true. It doesn’t matter how inexperienced the bitcoin community will get, this factor might go both means.

The Precise Questions That Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold should reply

The US Authorities needs to know:

  • “How much energy did each of the company’s cryptomining facilities use during 2021?”
  • “What are the energy sources used by utilities serving each of the facilities, including the energy mix of each?”
  • “What is the proportion of energy used that is offset with renewable energy credits?”
  • “In the last 12 months, how many days have the companies curtailed cryptomining to support grid stability?”
  • “In 2021, what was the average cost per megawatt hour and per megawatt hour profit at each of the company’s cryptomining facilities?”

Do you actually assume Core Scientific, Marathon, Riot, and Stronghold aren’t prepared for these questions? They’ve been working in the direction of these targets for the reason that very starting. The Home Committee On Power and Commerce can be pleasantly stunned.

Featured Picture: Home Committee On Power and Commerce header | Charts by TradingView

FED, dollar bills



spot_img

Related Posts

Pancakeswap integrates Transak for fiat onboarding on multiple chains

0
Decentralized exchange Pancakeswap now offers Transak as a provider in its “buy crypto” tab, giving Pancakeswap users an additional option when shopping for...